|
Send this Runner's Web Story's URL to a friend.   Comment on this story. Visit the FrontPage for the latest news.   |     View in Runner's Web Frame |
|
| ||||
|
Posted: December 14, 2004 Multisport: Finding Your Maximum Aerobic Heart Rate From: EnduranceCoach.com
Recently I read an article titled: `Building Blocks' by Mark Allen ('Triathlete' magazine, March 2004) that dealt with the importance of building a good base by training below your maximum aerobic heart rate. The article covered how to find this heart rate and the reasons why training at this intensity is crucial. With some athletes I'm coaching just starting into their base training, I decided to use some of what Allen had to say to explain the importance to them of training easier rather than harder to get the best long term results. Of special interest to me was the formula Allen uses to calculate an athletes maximum aerobic training heart rate because it doesn't require you to know your maximum heart rate. The formula, or calculation is: 1. Take 180 and subtract your age. b. Leave the number where it is if you have been working out about two to three days per week for at least a year. c. Add five beats if you have been working out more than three days per week for at least a year. d. Add 10 beats if you have been working out more than five days per week for at least five years without recurring colds, illnesses, injuries or long periods of burnout. e. If you are older than 55 years old or younger than 25 years old, add an additional five beats to whatever number you have right now. (Note: if you are trying to decide between two of the above statements, it is much better to pick the one that gives you a lower training heart rate than the one that will give you the higher training heart rate.) How Does This Compare with Other Methods? Using this method to obtain my own heart rates, I used: 180 - 34 = 146, then add (d) from above, so, 156bpm. After working through this I decided to sit down and cross reference it with a few other methods used to determine training zones to see exactly where it fitted into the grand scheme of things. The methods I used to cross reference were: · Percentages of predicted maximum heart rate To cross-reference the different methods I chose three key maximum heart rate percentages. NOTE: these are representative percentages only. Lab testing would in most cases give more accurate percentages. · 60%: the percentage at which significant aerobic training takes place and below which I would describe as recovery training. We can call this aerobic threshold Results of Cross Referencing with Other Methods As with the Allen method above, as an example for each calculation I have used my own heart rate data. Method 1: Predicted Maximum Heart Rate Using: 220 - age to predict maximum heart rate. At the ripe old age of 34, my predicted max would be 186.
Using: My actual maximum heart rate which is 197 x 60% = 118 bpm Method 3: Karvonen Formula Maximum Heart Rate - Resting Heart Rate = Heart Rate Range (HRR) Eg: my HRR is 197 - 40 = 157 HRR x 60% = 94 bpm 80% = 126 + 40 = 166bpm 85% = 133 + 40 = 173bpm Method 4: EnduranceCoach.com Training Zones Four key heart rates are needed to begin with: (Mine are in brackets) 1) Maximum Heart rate (197) 4) Anaerobic Threshold (AT). ( I will use 173 from the Karvonen formula above. Once again, this should really be accurately assessed for best results.) Very Easy = below aerobic threshold (eg: below 119 bpm) Hard = Upper 1/3 of zone between aerobic threshold and anaerobic threshold (155bpm-173bpm) Very Hard = From your anaerobic threshold, halfway up to your maximum (173bpm-185 bpm) Very Very Hard = From halfway between your anaerobic threshold and your maximum, up to your maximum (185bpm-197bpm) Observations after Cross Referencing · For me, the first thing to note is that using the Predicted maximum heart rate calculation of 220 - age is a waste of time. My actual Maximum is 13 bpm higher than predicted. There are other Predicted Heart Rate formulas that may be more accurate. Conclusions About Determining Training Heart Rates This is not a scientific research paper with multiple subjects but by looking at a few different methods of finding training zones I believe it is possible to work out some fairly accurate training zones without going to a lab and without going through the rigours of a maximum heart rate test. I believe a really important training heart rate is the maximum aerobic training heart rate. I would expect the endurance athletes I coach to do 90% or more of their training at this heart rate. The Mark Allen method of determining this heart rate appears to correlate well with other methods that calculate 80% of maximum heart rate. This method doesn't require you to know your maximum heart rate and it adjusts for not only age but also experience and illness or injury. In general this method gives a conservative heart rate that is safe to do a large volume of aerobic training at. The only glitch I have encountered with this method is when the athlete is young and has a number of years of consistent training behind them. Their aerobic training heart rates can end up well over 170bpm. In these cases I would tend to want some testing or an accurate maximum heart rate to plug into the EnduranceCoach method. Copyright Endurance Sports Limited 2004 Comment on this story. |
| |||
|
Runner's Web FrontPage | ||||