Posted: August 26, 2005
Science of Sport: Thermogenesis - It’s not just what you eat…
…but how and when you eat it, according to new UK
research. For most athletes, maintaining optimum weight is vital to
performance, especially as excess weight in the form of fat is an
instant recipe for slower times. Although maintaining a daily
calorie balance (calories consumed equal to calories expended)
plays a major role in weight maintenance, other mechanisms are also
important, including thermogenesis, whereby small amounts of excess
calories are burned off as heat, rather than stored as fat.
Thermogenesis is thought to explain why, for example, an athlete
in hard training, burning anything up to 6,000kcals per day, who
consumes an extra 100kcals per day (the amount contained in a
banana) beyond his or her daily calorie expenditure figure,
doesn’t gain the extra weight that the simple calorie balance
theory would predict!
Now researchers in Nottingham studying the thermic effect of
food (whereby the digestion, absorption and metabolism of food acts
to raise metabolic rate and calorie expenditure) have discovered
that the regularity of meals affects the rate of thermogenesis and
subsequent calorie ‘burn’(1)
Nine healthy lean women were asked to continue consuming their
normal diet for 14 days in one of two patterns:
- Taken as six small meals per day, eaten at regular intervals
(A);
- Taken as three to nine meals per day, eaten at irregular
intervals and varied at random throughout the 14-day period
(B).
After 14 days, all the women resumed their usual eating patterns
for two weeks, then switched to the other group for a further two
weeks (ie those in A switched to B and vice versa).
The women underwent a variety of tests at the beginning and end
of each study period, including an overnight fast to determine
resting metabolism and measurement (for three hours) of metabolic
rate following consumption of a milkshake test meal, containing 50%
of calories as carbohydrate, 15% as protein and 35% as fat.
The researchers found that while the average daily calorie
intake remained the same, regardless of eating pattern, and resting
metabolism after an overnight fast remained unchanged, the overall
thermic effect of the milkshake meal was significantly higher
following a regular meal pattern (A) than an irregular one (B).
And the researchers went on to conclude that the reduced thermic
effect associated with irregular eating might be significant enough
to lead to weight gain in the long-term!
These findings may help to explain what many bodybuilders
striving for reduced body fat while maintaining sufficient calorie
intake to train and recover have known intuitively all along: that
several small meals consumed at evenly-spaced intervals throughout
the day are preferable to irregular and variable consumption.
The same research group went on to analyse the health
implications of irregular v regular eating patterns by measuring
circulating glucose, lipids, insulin and uric acid in blood samples
taken over a three-hour period following the consumption of a
high-carbohydrate test meal(2). They
found that peak insulin levels were significantly higher after
irregular eating, as were markers of total insulin secreted,
indicating a degree of insulin resistance. Moreover, levels of LDL
cholesterol (the ‘bad’ sort, associated with heart
disease) were also raised by irregular eating patterns.
The researchers concluded: ‘An irregular meal frequency
appears to produce a degree of insulin resistance and higher
fasting lipid profiles, which may indicate a deleterious effect for
cardiovascular risk factors. Quite apart from the health
implications, optimum insulin function is vital for recovery,
growth and regulation of energy in hard-working bodies.
The message for athletes seems to be that careful forward
planning of meals and snacks is more important than we had
previously realised; the evidence suggests that it’s not just
what and how much we eat that matters, but also when and how we eat
it!
Andrew Hamilton
References
- International Journal of Obesity, vol 28, no, 653-660
- International Journal of Obesity, vol 58, no 7, 1071-1077
|
|